DHCR Decisions        Adm. Review Docket No.: FB 630030-RO                                 STATE OF NEW YORK                     DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL                           OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION                                    GERTZ PLAZA                              92-31 UNION HALL STREET                              JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433        ------------------------------------X        IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE :  ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW        APPEAL OF                              DOCKET NO.: FB 630030-RO                                            :               PARKCHESTER   MANAGEMENT   CORP.,        DRO    DOCKET    NOS.:                                               FB 630023-OR/ BH 610093-S                              PETITIONER    :        ------------------------------------X                                               ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW        On  May  1,  1991,  the  above-named  owner  filed  a  petition  for        administrative  review  of  an  order  issued  on  April  23,   1991        concerning t e  housing  accommodations  relating  to   the   above-        described docket number.          The Commissioner has reviewed all the evidence in the record and has        carefully considered that portion of  the  record  relevant  to  the        issues raised by the petition.        The owner commenced this proceeding on February 5, 1991 by filing an        application asserting that the owner had failed to maintain  certain        services in the subject apartment.        Thereafter on March 22, 1991, an inspection of the subject apartment        was conducted by a DHCR inspector who confirmed  that  services  had        not been restored.        The Rent Administrator denied the owner's application on  April  23,        1991 and continued the rent reduction in effect.        In its petition for administrative  review,  the  owner  states,  in        substance, that repairs have been performed and  that  all  services        are part of normal maintenance.        In reply, the tenants asserted on June 10, 1991  that  services  had        not been restored.        After careful consideration, the Commissioner is of the opinion that        the petition should be denied.        The owner's petition does not make clear whether it is  the  owner's        contention that repairs had  been  made  before  the  apartment  was        inspected or before the order was issued, or whether the  contention        is that repairs  were  made  following  the  issuance  of  the  Rent        Administrator's order.  If  it  is  the  former,  then  the  owner's        allegation is belied by the report of the agency inspector.   If  it        is the latter, then the Rent Administrator's order reducing the rent        was nevertheless correct when  issued,  and  this  order  is  issued        without prejudice to the owner filing an application for restoration        of services.        THEREFORE, in accordance with the Rent Stabilization Law  and  Code,        Adm. Review Docket No.: FB 630030-RO        and the Rent and Eviction Regulations, it is        ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, denied,  and        that the District Rent Administrator's order be, and the same hereby        is, affirmed.        ISSUED:                                                                                                              ELLIOT SANDER                                        Deputy Commissioner