Posted by David G on March 21, 2000 at 19:37:14:
the paikoff v harris decision last year seemed to indicate that sponsors could not kick renters out of coops. have there been any updates on this case? would it be foolish to use paikoff v harris to argue that the sponsor should allow us to stay in our apt, even though he wants to sell it?
thanks for providing this cool forum.
Note: Posting is disabled in all archives
Post a Followup