Posted by brenda on April 17, 2000 at 16:38:55: In Reply to: I think its an 'or' not an 'and' posted by MikeW on April 17, 2000 at 16:18:13: Under the 1993 law (unless it's been changed since then) the rule is $250,000 in income for the preceding two years AND the rent is over $2000.If the apt. is vacant, however, it is decontrolled over $2000. Follow Ups: Re: Nope, it's "and" (thank God!) JV 04/17/00 (1) Re: Nope, it's "and" (thank God!) brenda 04/18/00 (0) Note: Posting is disabled in all archives Post a Followup Name : E-Mail : Subject : Comments: : Under the 1993 law (unless it's been changed since then) the rule is $250,000 in income for the preceding two years AND the rent is over $2000. : If the apt. is vacant, however, it is decontrolled over $2000. Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL:
Posted by brenda on April 17, 2000 at 16:38:55:
In Reply to: I think its an 'or' not an 'and' posted by MikeW on April 17, 2000 at 16:18:13:
Under the 1993 law (unless it's been changed since then) the rule is $250,000 in income for the preceding two years AND the rent is over $2000.If the apt. is vacant, however, it is decontrolled over $2000.
Follow Ups:
Note: Posting is disabled in all archives Post a Followup
Name : E-Mail : Subject : Comments: : Under the 1993 law (unless it's been changed since then) the rule is $250,000 in income for the preceding two years AND the rent is over $2000. : If the apt. is vacant, however, it is decontrolled over $2000. Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: