Posted by Dawn on November 20, 2000 at 17:49:29:
In Reply to: rent stabilization problem posted by Johanna on November 20, 2000 at 16:30:49:
whether or not it's rent stabilized or not (blumberg form). Did you sign a one year or two year lease? From what I understood from this website, it's 4% for a one year lease and 6% for a two year lease. When you mentioned that DCHR said it was registered once in 1996, did she say what it was registered as? it seems to me that if you were offered a new lease, it might be rent stabilized, but again, you must check your lease.
: I have lived in my brooklyn apt. for a little over a year now and have just signed my second lease with my landlord. She told me that she was raising my rent by 5%, which means that with the new lease, I am paying 787.00 per month for a tiny, fourth story walk-up.
: Needless to say, i feel and have always felt that I am being ripped off and charged too much for my living space. The building falls into the criteria for being a rent stabilized building, but my landlord says it is not and that they are therefore permitted to charge me whatever they see fit.
: I recently called the DHCR to request information regarding what I can do, and they were very unhelpful. The woman told me that my building was only registered for one year, 1996, and that she would send me an overcharge form. Does this mean that the building is not rent stabilized and I have no recourse whatsoever? Is there anything I can do? And if a building has been registered as being rent stabilized one year, is it always considered rent stabilized?
Note: Posting is disabled in all archives
Post a Followup