---

Posted by Ace on August 09, 2001 at 12:58:43:

In Reply to: This is what posted by tenantperson on August 08, 2001 at 11:24:50:

In the second case of the Missionary Sisters, they ended up paying the difference between the preferential and the legal rent.

I re-read the case articles attached. So while preferential rent can be argued away as completely irrelevant in the first case, in the second case, it was not.

it depends on who you ask and who's interpreting. as i said in my previous post!!!!

thanks for pointing out my error, regardless.

: Go back to the link -- the misinformation is the unequivocal headline... YES can charge the legal rent because it's "legal rent"

: Wrong wrong wrong.

Follow Ups:

---

Note: Posting is disabled in all archives
Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:
: In the second case of the Missionary Sisters, they ended up paying the difference between the preferential and the legal rent.

: I re-read the case articles attached.  So while preferential rent can be argued away as completely irrelevant in the first case, in the second case, it was not.  

: it depends on who you ask and who's interpreting.  as i said in my previous post!!!!  

: thanks for pointing out my error, regardless.

: 
: : Go back to the link -- the misinformation is the unequivocal headline... YES can charge the legal rent because it's "legal rent" 

: : Wrong wrong wrong. 


Optional Link URL:  
Link Title:         
Optional Image URL: 

---