---

Posted by Lilly on September 28, 2001 at 09:43:58:

In Reply to: Re: Regarding harressment..no harrasment! posted by dj on September 28, 2001 at 08:38:26:

Well not so fast: The LL re-rented the apt right away therefore there was no loss to him. I believe the LL has been unjustly enriched in this instance. I would take him to court, and the venue is VIRGINIA, where you, the plaintiff, resides.
This lease provision is to protect the LL against damages and loss of income; in this instance there is neither, other than LLs minor costs (advertising?) associated with re-renting the apt. GO for it!

Follow Ups:

• Re: Regarding harressment..no harrasment! Lilly 09/28/01 (0)

---

Note: Posting is disabled in all archives
Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:
: Well not so fast: The LL re-rented the apt right away therefore there was no loss to him. I believe the LL has been unjustly enriched in this instance. I would take him to court, and the venue is VIRGINIA, where you, the plaintiff, resides.
: This lease provision is to protect the LL against damages and loss of income; in this instance there is neither, other than LLs minor costs (advertising?) associated with re-renting the apt. GO for it! 


Optional Link URL:  
Link Title:         
Optional Image URL: 

---