---

Posted by joseph on May 07, 1997 at 15:40:26:

Whether you like it or not there must be a compromise because the governor
wants an "orderly transition" to market. How about this? 1) No protection for anyone making over $100,000 per year. 2) No protection for anyone paying more than $1,750 per month. 3) No more "ineritance" of apartments. 4) If a landlord wants to tear down a building he can, provided that the tenants are guaranteed a smiliar apartment at the same rent (nice way to end the housing shortage). 5) 100% decontrol with harsh penalites and landlords who harass their tenants. This will protect over 90% of the tenants! What's wrong with this?

Follow Ups:

• Re: COMPROMISE!! Sir Loving 5/07/97 (1)
  • Re: COMPROMISE!! larry 5/13/97 (0)

---

Note: Posting is disabled in all archives
Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:
: Whether you like it or not there must be a compromise because the governor 
: wants an "orderly transition" to market. How about this? 1) No protection for anyone making over $100,000 per year. 2) No protection for anyone paying more than $1,750 per month. 3) No more "ineritance" of apartments. 4) If a landlord wants to tear down a building he can, provided that the tenants are guaranteed a smiliar apartment at the same rent (nice way to end the housing shortage). 5) 100% decontrol with harsh penalites and landlords who harass their tenants. This will protect over 90% of the tenants! What's wrong with this?



Optional Link URL:  
Link Title:         
Optional Image URL: 

---