---

Posted by MikeW on October 22, 1998 at 13:31:12:

In Reply to: New Paikoff v. Harris ruling posted by Eric Roberts on October 21, 1998 at 21:44:42:

Based on what I've read, the ruling only applies to units owned by the original sponsor, or 'a holder of unsold shares'. If your landlord purchased the apartment from the sponsor, I doubt you'd be covered.

Also, the ruling comes out of Brooklyn housing court, and technically does not apply in Manhattan. However, the Manhattan judges will probably consider it's conclusions in making their own rulings.

Follow Ups:

• Re: Only applies if renting from sponsor Mark Smith 10/24/98 (0)

---

Note: Posting is disabled in all archives
Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:
: Based on what I've read, the ruling only applies to units owned by the original sponsor, or 'a holder of unsold shares'.   If your landlord purchased the apartment from the sponsor, I doubt you'd be covered.

: Also, the ruling comes out of Brooklyn housing court, and technically does not apply in Manhattan.  However, the Manhattan judges will probably consider it's conclusions in making their own rulings.


Optional Link URL:  
Link Title:         
Optional Image URL: 

---