---

Posted by Caroline Fass on October 25, 1999 at 19:39:29:

THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS FOR A 2 FAMILY HOUSE, THE MULTIPLE DWELLING REGISTRATION NUMBER IS FOR A THREE FAMILY HOUSE AND THE LANDLORD PUT 4 FAMILY HOUSE ON THE NOTICE OF PETITION. THIS HOUSE HAS VIOLATIONS THAT STATE IT IS A LEGAL THREE FAMILY AND THE JUDGE RULED THAT THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS FOR A FOUR FAMILY HOUSE BECAUSE IT STATES "FOUR DWELLINGS". I PROVED THAT THERE WERE 4 APPLICATIONS MADE FOR 4 DIFFERENT HOUSES AND THAT EACH APPLICATION WAS FOR A 2 FAMILY HOUSE AND THE JUDGE STILL RULED FOR THE LANDLORD. WHICH COURT DO I GO TO TO FILE AN APPEAL. I LIVE IN FAR ROCKAWAY QUEENS.

Follow Ups:

• Re: JUDGE GRANTED SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR LANDLORD Mark Smith 10/25/99 (3)
  • Re: JUDGE GRANTED SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR LANDLORD Caroline Fass 10/27/99 (2)
    • Re: JUDGE GRANTED SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR LANDLORD Anna 10/27/99 (1)
      • Re: JUDGE GRANTED SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR LANDLORD Caroline Fass 10/28/99 (0)
• Re: HELP PLEASE, JUDGE GRANTED SUMMARY JUDGEMENT FOR LANDLORD Caroline Fass 10/25/99 (0)

---

Note: Posting is disabled in all archives
Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:
: THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS FOR A 2 FAMILY HOUSE, THE MULTIPLE DWELLING REGISTRATION NUMBER IS FOR A THREE FAMILY HOUSE AND THE LANDLORD PUT 4 FAMILY HOUSE ON THE NOTICE OF PETITION.  THIS HOUSE HAS VIOLATIONS THAT STATE IT IS A LEGAL THREE FAMILY AND THE JUDGE RULED THAT THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS FOR A FOUR FAMILY HOUSE BECAUSE IT STATES "FOUR DWELLINGS".  I PROVED THAT THERE WERE 4 APPLICATIONS MADE FOR 4 DIFFERENT HOUSES AND THAT EACH APPLICATION WAS FOR A 2 FAMILY HOUSE AND THE JUDGE STILL RULED FOR THE LANDLORD.  WHICH COURT DO I GO TO TO FILE AN APPEAL.  I LIVE IN FAR ROCKAWAY QUEENS.


Optional Link URL:  
Link Title:         
Optional Image URL: 

---