Moderator: TenantNet
by hsinorc » Thu Apr 14, 2016 11:09 am
by TenantNet » Thu Apr 14, 2016 9:40 pm
by hsinorc » Thu Apr 14, 2016 10:53 pm
by TenantNet » Thu Apr 14, 2016 11:17 pm
by hsinorc » Fri Apr 15, 2016 12:11 pm
by TenantNet » Fri Apr 15, 2016 9:34 pm
The reason they are applying for MCI for only one unit is because I am the only Rent Stabilized tenant in the building.
Thank-you for pointing out Line 26 of the PW1: The one I have is from the file that ORA sent me in the oil-to-gas conversion case, and there are checks in the "NO" boxes for OCCUPIED, and "NO" for Rent Control or Rent Stabilization, with neither of the qualifying boxes below that checked (re: notification fo DHCR). These should have been marked YES.
I will not be permitted to raise 'new' facts or present 'new' evidence in my Petition for Administrative Review, only to seek review of the points I had previously raised as to fact and law.
by 10ants » Mon Apr 18, 2016 1:28 pm
by hsinorc » Wed Apr 20, 2016 7:32 pm
by hsinorc » Tue Apr 26, 2016 1:07 pm
by Sky » Tue Apr 26, 2016 4:25 pm
by hsinorc » Tue Apr 26, 2016 7:50 pm
-This project will more than likely kick up a lot of dust:
-I would expect a TPP (Tenant Protection Plan, aka TSP 'Tenant Safety Plan') to be filed with the DOB outlining the steps and procedures in place to minimise impact on the tenants: how/where tenants will reside during renovations, what measures will be used to ensure tenant safety, how noise and dust will be managed, material handling and storage, contaminants (lead contaminated dust and debris?), etc. You can inquire about this.
by TenantNet » Tue Apr 26, 2016 11:07 pm
by hsinorc » Tue Apr 26, 2016 11:13 pm
by 10ants » Wed Apr 27, 2016 1:36 pm
by hsinorc » Wed Apr 27, 2016 3:38 pm
Return to NYC Rent Regulated Apartments
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 107 guests
Subscribe to our Mailing List! | |||||||